you mentioned the point about the vaccines. like, why are no lawmaker saying anything about this? > it's hurting people in every direction. Underlying ailment, then you are by definition trying to hurt the older person. so if you're giving preference and medical treatment to a young healthy person over senior citizen with a profound and > tucker: i agree and i'm really struck by the lack of good faith. instead we seem hell-bent at every corner and going in the opposite direction and if we keep doing it i think this is the beginning of the end of the american experiment as we know it. the best way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop this ruminating - discriminating on the basis of race. there is long-standing supreme court document that says rany state-based classification on the basis of race is subject to strict scrutiny and any constitutional scholar who isn't lying to you will tell you this is hands-down failing that test. Guesste what, it's also true tht men are more likely to die of covid infection than none of those documents propose apportioning care for men rather than women. it's a political agenda all the way down disguised in the veneer of science? they justify it by saying that outcomes are worse for nonwhite populationsif than white populations resulting from covid-19. i can't think of anything that destroys that trust more quickly or permanently than policies like this. you have to believe that the doctor has your interests at heart. all kinds of things to say about this but i can't help but think that trust in a doctor is the key to our entire health care system. vivek ramaswamy have been thinking about the intersection of politics and race and science, he's a lawyer and a scientist or he's also the author of "woke inc" and he ,joins us. but denying health care to american citizens because of their race? that is too much. the only sin is complaining about it.ar that makes you a monster. We are used to hearing that your kids can't get into a certain school if they are the wrong color or get a certain job if they don't have the g right appearance, and apparently we've accepted that. the question is why are americans putting up with it? it's immoral. the websitela maintained by the county in texas explains that being nonwhite automatically makes you eligible for treatment. without even assessing the relative health risks involved. someone being denied medical treatment because he's the wrong color. last year the infusion center's website which says it's state-funded featured informationfu sheet that explicy listed race as an factor for getting antibody therapy. the north central texas covid-19 regional infusion center was created by the texas department of health. we reached out to the texas department of health about this back in november and they denied allocating any health care on the basis of race. i am being denied medical service because of my race? > tucker: so you can't get life-saving drugs from the government of texas if you're the wrong color. in new york, in a shocking new piece, "racial minorities are if you have high blood pressure and you are 60, you get one point. minnesota awards two points to so-called bipoc patients, that's someone who's not white. soot if you are a white congeste heart failure patient, that's not enough for you. if you have congestive heart failure at the same time, you get one point. the state of utah gives two points to anyone simply for not being white. srace often counts more than physical health. in utah, covid patients are triaged by a scoring system that determines whether or not they qualify for these potentially life-saving antibody treatments. physicians, the fda explained, should consider "race and ethnicity" as they minister treatment so positions are doing that across the country.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |